Search our Archives:
» Home
» History
» Holidays
» Humor
» Places
» Thought
» Opinion & Society
» Writings
» Customs
» Misc.
|
Understanding the Soul
By Yechezkel Gold
A basic tenet of Torah is that God is one.
Nevertheless, Torah does not purport that we
view God equally, or in the same manner, in
each experience. Indeed, even during the most
significant moments of Jewish history, we each
perceived God differently. Thus, regarding
revelation of God when we received the ten
commandments, the Medrash, Shmos Raba (29) relates: “Rabbi
Levi explained.... If “The voice of God is in
His power”, the world could not bear it.
Rather, it is written (Psalms 29) “The voice
of God is in power”, according to the strength
of each individual....”
Moreover, Rashi’s commentary on the first
commandment, “(I am the Lord, your God) who
took you out from the land of Egypt”, states:
“Because He was revealed at the (Red) Sea as a
heroic warrior, and he was revealed here (on
Mount Sinai) as an elder full of
compassion...., since my revelation varies, do
not say that two separate powers exist. I am
He who took you out of Egypt and on the Sea.”
Because God’s revelation varies so widely,
because each instant of experience is unique,
it behooves us to develop and refine the
sensitivity of perception that enables us to
participate and enter into the unique
Godliness of each moment. This can be
accomplished through study of Torah,
generally, and of Kabbala, specifically.
Kabbala Enhances Experience
Kabbalistic literature has developed a
terminology which helps appreciate the
specialness and variety of experience,
concomitantly increasing our sensitivity to
the details and depth of each unique event.
This is not to say that the purpose of Kabbala
study is primarily to heighten sensitivity to
experience. Rather, this study in itself is an
exhilarating wealth of spiritual pleasure, an
entrance into the awesome, magnificent realms
of Torah and sanctity. In this contemplation
of ways of being, the beauty of God’s creation
- with spirituality and physicality combined
and integrated into a still greater whole -
emerges spontaneously.
Study of Kabbala progressively elucidates
certain profound and difficult concepts.
Advancement in this study really begins,
however, when the individual goes beyond these
abstruse intellectual constructs to insight
into the underlying reality they describe. One
element of genuine personal understanding is
far more valuable than extensive but
superficial formal knowledge.
This can operate in two ways. Focusing on
personal experience, an individual may notice
that Kabbalistic concepts he has learned aptly
describe reality. This approach is probably
the most effective for individuals bent on
fully living, grappling with, and
characterizing personal experience. Searching
for terms and concepts which fit the
perceptions, the person finds Kabbalism
particularly suitable.
Also useful, systematic exploration of
Kabbalistic concepts brings understanding by
referring to one’s inner reality. In practice,
this method is probably used most often. It
has the advantage of broadening and deepening
insight, not being limited by spontaneous
perceptions of inner reality; it introduces
observations to which one may not have been
sensitive without the aid of the sacred books.
Kabbala and Psychotherapy
Since insight into Kabbalism is a process of
gaining clarity and proper perspective on
one’s inner world, and more important, of
affirming and delighting in life through this
process, it serves as a form of psychotherapy.
It would be greatly reductionistic to
characterize Kabbalism as only a form of
psychotherapy; much more is included in that
lofty field of study. However, it would also
err to state that Kabbalism is not, or is only
tangentially, a form of psychotherapy, too. As
the Chassidic mystical classic Tanya states:
“Knowledge of the organization of the supernal
worlds is a great mitzvah, besides bringing
wholeness of soul and happiness.”
One could categorize the healing of soul
engendered by Kabbalistic study as follows:
This study brings one to realize one’s place
in the universe, that universe comprising both
physical and spiritual elements, and the
presence of God in that universe imbuing all
with sublime magnificence, heartfelt meaning,
and deep joy. One gratefully accept one’s
place in the universe as the great privilege
life truly is.
We come to appreciate God’s presence in the
universe not only through simple belief.
True, faith is important and praiseworthy. It
is an assumption which permits the individual
a greater sense of meaning and purpose,
greater fortitude in the face of adversity,
and perhaps a simpler and more logical
intellectual organization of reality. However,
the process of refinement through Torah, and
specifically through Kabbalistic study leads
one to appreciate - not just believe in - the
awesome depth and wisdom, elatingly pleasing
magnificence, and tremendous joy of existence,
which evokes and which can be fairly described
only as a reflection of the Divine. Its
character and our experience of it is Divine.
The universe glows with a Godly luminance.
If we are unaware of this luminance, it is for
lack of the necessary mental tools.
Encouragingly, though, the personality
elements requisite to perceiving reality as a
reflection of the Divine already exist. For
instance, underlying our experience of reality
is at least some sense of integration. Object
constancy exemplifies this implicit
integration. We intuitively feel an underlying
unity of experience, order in the
multiplicity. Too, we form mental
representations, implicitly and explicitly, to
describe and predict the order and integration
we sense. This underlying sense of underlying
generality unifying the details of experience
comprises an important, quite constant element
of personality.
The character of generality is that it can
never become specific, though. A concept, by
nature of being a concept, is never fully
realized directly in details. Rather, details
only reflect the underlying unity contained in
the concept. For example, the notion of "sheep"
includes all sheep, and all potential sheep,
and unifies and integrates all instances of
sheep ever encountered. Each individual sheep
ever met, however, does not fully express the
totality contained within the notion of sheep.
Other sheep, with somewhat different
characteristics, may also exist and can
equally be classified as sheep. The notion of
sheep, thus, contains a wealth of potential
which remains in a spiritual realm, underlying
but not merging with physical and sensory
reality.
The realm of generality is not confined to a
single idea, of course. The notion of sheep is
merely one instance of the multiplicity of
notions which may exist in that spiritual
domain. Nor is that domain confined to ideas,
as we discussed above. The general sense of
oneness and integration, of infinite potential
which can give rise to and integrate all
possible details, is that continual aspect of
reality underlying experience. It is
everyone’s access to the realm of
spirituality, and becoming aware and
consciously regarding that reality is the
mental tool enabling each of us to begin to
perceive Divine luminance.
Spirituality
We added that spirituality not only integrates
but also gives rise to details because without
integration of details, disintegration
results. Without integration of its organs,
the body disintegrates. Without an integrating
goal and plan, activity disintegrates. Very
disorganized perception may be no perception
at all. Integrated existence of specifics
depends on their general spiritual source.
In the Tanya (chapter. 48), the spiritual realm
underlying experience of physical reality is
compared to the relationship between infinity
and specific numbers. The entirety of the
whole number system, for example, is an
infinite set of individual numbers. Each
number exists and is defined by the set. There
can be no exhaustive list of the elements of
that set because the set is infinite, but the
set is still the source of each exemplar of
that set. Similarly, the Infinity which
surrounds and underlies created reality
comprises and integrates all the disparate
elements of that reality. If we perceive
reality in that manner, we are experientially
aware of God as the infinite, imminent source
of a luminous reality.
This is a general approach to viewing
spiritual reality. It focuses on the
perception of the Divine in everything. As
discussed above, however, Kabbala does not
purport that our experience is uniform. We can
view the Divine in the specifics, too. Indeed,
Kabbala explores in depth and detail the
different kinds of human experiential modes,
such as the primarily intellectual mode which
subdivides into creative, analytical and
knowledge modes, the primarily emotional mode
with the full gamut of moods and feelings, and
the primarily practical mode, ranging from the
background of pragmatism to active involvement
in being effective. Moreover, parallel to
these human modes of operation, Kabbalism
discusses a constellation of mystical worlds
or realms.
Systematic Study of Mysticism
When one begins systematic study of mysticism,
at least according to the Chassidic paradigm,
a verse in the Book of Job (19, 26) commonly
serves as an introduction: “And from my flesh,
I will discern God”. This approach enables us
to understand mystical concepts about the
supernal realms by comparing them to human and
personal psychology and experience. The verse
(Gen. 1, 27) “...in the image of God He
created man” encapsulates this notion.
It is important to state that the parallelism
discussed does not imply, in most cases, that
human experience is on the same level as the
parallel Kabbalistic realm. For example, Etz
Chayim relates that the revered Ari, Rabbi Yitzhak Askenazi, generally
considered the foremost Kabbalist in at least
the last five hundred years, told his student,
Rabbi Chayim Vital, that in his dream one
Sabbath, his soul ascended to the World of
Yetzirah. When Rabbi Vital asked his mentor to
describe what he experienced there, the Ari
answered that to describe it would require
eighty years. One understands that this level
of experience was uncommon, perhaps even for
the Ari. This fact becomes more striking when
one considers that of the four mystical worlds
generally mentioned, Yetzirah is “merely”
third in level, incomparably lower than the
two highest. We can understand, then, that for
most people, even those engaged in this
profound study, personal experience is merely
a reflection of the mystical worlds, with a
similar plan of organization but radically
different in level.
That level of dealing with this notion is
primarily cognitive. It is a necessary first
step, but many people entering the study of
mysticism seek more profound, experiential
contact with the reality beyond Kabbala’s
concepts. We begin to connect tangibly with
those mystical realms by actively regarding
our personal experience as the direct and
imminent reflection of those supernal worlds.
Our lives are the conclusion of spiritual
processes occurring above. Viewing experience
in that manner releases our intellects and
emotions from the materialist mind-set and
opens the gate to the mystical realms.
The Individual Experience
In that context, each separate facet of
experience, each dimension of personality,
each individuated perspective and approach to
life, reflect a realm of the mystical reality.
The human personality is not monolithic. It is
a more or less well integrated myriad of
sub-personalities, each with different
philosophies, perceptions, goals and methods.
Proper integration of the various
sub-personalities achieved by the personality
brings effectiveness and satisfaction of the
whole.
Rabbi Moshe Cordovero wrote that the six words
of the first line of Shema Yisroel represent
the six spiritual directions. Indeed, some
people have the custom of physically turning
the head to these six directions while saying
the word ekhod, “one”. The message is clear:
all spiritual dimensions, including each of
the sub-personalities, are really one. This is
so not because they are necessarily
conceptually connected, but rather because
each is - and properly should be viewed as -
an expression of the Infinite potential
underlying the universe.
Since such variance in philosophy,
perspective, goals and methods exists among
the different sub-personalities, they would
be, and in a poorly integrated personality
often are, at odds with each other. A frequent
result is rejection of a sub-personality and
its concomitant energies and potential for
living fully. Indeed, particularly in modern
culture, the spiritual dimensions of
personality, the realm of ideals, ethics,
fervor, reverence and transcendence is often
ignored or expunged. The result is discontent
and social ills.
Mystical Roots of the Personality
By exploring each sub-personality and its
mystical roots, one achieves integration. As
mentioned above, this integration is not
necessarily mediated by intellectual
organization. Rather, through mysticism, each
sub-personality assumes its own true position
in the constellation of sub-personalities
within the individual.
For example, most people have a practical
side. The philosophy underlying practicality
is pragmatism, and the perspective underlying
pragmatism is recognition of the reality and
importance of the extrinsic domain.
Willingness to think and act in terms dictated
by that extrinsic domain despite a measure of
conflict between one’s spontaneous inner
reality and that extrinsic realm generally
entails becoming reconciled to that domain.
This is a successful resolution of the problem
of an extrinsic reality. One’s sense of
dependence on extrinsic reality accompanied by
awareness of extrinsic reality’s apparent
independence of one’s spontaneous internal
reality engenders fear and respect of that
extrinsic reality. One fears for one’s
personal well-being and therefore some of the
demands of the internal self seem less cogent
and are relinquished. That fear ultimately
underlies the philosophy of pragmatism;
pragmatism, especially willing pragmatism, is
the successful resolution of that fear.
In Kabbalistic terms, the parallel, or source
spiritual process is referred to as Malchus,
God’s kingdom. Malchus corresponds to what is
termed “lower fear”, fear for oneself, as
opposed to higher fear which is fear that one
may desecrate what is held precious. Lower
fear, too, is emanated from above. It is the
least level of contact with God; as opposed to
a measure of “sharing God’s perspective” as in
higher spiritual levels, Malchus is merely
awareness enough of God’s perspective to
accommodate to it, just as subjects
accommodate themselves to a king’s will out of
fear, without necessarily sharing his aims or
perspective.
Relating to God
The holy books state that for God to be King,
there must be subjects who by definition are
separate from him, i.e. do not share His
perspective. Hence, from God’s emanation of
Malchus, of His being King, the realm of
otherness, of another perspective besides the
one which directly reflects God, is formed.
However, the otherness does not simply exist
other than God. Rather, the realm of
separateness exists by virtue of God’s being
King, and is dependent on God’s Malchus.
Recognizing this discrepancy of perspective
and dependence engenders fear, the lower fear
discussed above. Reconciling the two disparate
levels is accomplished through pragmatism:
renouncing one’s inner perspective in order to
accommodate outer realities. That is how the
pragmatist regards God’s perspective: as an
extrinsic reality. The demands of God’s
Kingdom do not allow full expression to the
spontaneous inner experience of His subjects.
Rather, obedience is demanded.
That is, the fact of the matter is that much
of the time there is divergence between
spontaneous inner reality and outer reality,
to the extent that we often suppress, deny,
and avoid our true desires and impulses. We
accommodate our actions, and even try to
accommodate our thoughts, to the demands of
extrinsic reality. That situation itself is
Malchus: we accept, somewhat out of coercion,
an extrinsic sovereignty, and concomitant with
our accepting extrinsic sovereignty, extrinsic
reality comes into existence.
Extrinsic Reality
It is important to note that the term
“extrinsic” is defined and employed
experientially here, and indeed, really has
meaning only experientially. Thus, the
perceived divergence between inner and outer
reality itself denotes Malchus. Prior to
awareness of extrinsic reality, it does not
properly exist extrinsically; reality is
holistic, with some elements emanating more
from within and some elements emanating more
from without, but not yet divided into two
separate realms. When we say that the demands
of outer reality correspond with God’s
Malchus, we speak experientially: our
experience of extrinsic reality is of a
separate, superior reality to which we must
conform. Torah, and specifically mystical
study, enables us to view that reality
accurately, to perceive God’s revelation in
the paradigm of God’s kingdom, and to refine
that perception until that truth shines forth
in full splendor.
It is striking to note that pragmatism is
often associated with a non-religious
philosophy of life. This is characteristic of
Malchus, which is denial of inner - spiritual
- reality in favor of extrinsic conditions. In
this case, there is denial of one’s inner
spirituality in order to conform to extrinsic
realities. Through our mystical work, we
recognize the underlying Malchus in this
paradigm, submission of the soul to an
extrinsic source of reality. This insight is
on the level of the soul, not of ideology or
intellect. Pragmatism, properly refined but
not subverted by considerations of other
personality components, is a true and
essential element of the Kabbalistic
personality and of the mystical realms it
reflects. Recognizing both the underlying
theme and the special characteristics of each
instance where we conform to pragmatic
realities imbues experience with Godly light.
When we become more refined, that
sub-personality pragmatically accommodates
itself to God’s explicit dictates in Torah:
Halacha.
Pragmatically accepting the condition of
extrinsic reality, which on a deeper level is
accepting the role of being God’s subject, is
one dimension of personality with an
underlying mystical meaning. Similarly, all of
our other roles and sub-personalities reflect
supernal realities, each in its own unique
manner.
The Emissary
Another sub-personality, similar to accepting
extrinsic mastery but reflecting a somewhat
higher spiritual level, is the role of
emissary. An emissary does not merely conform
to the demands of an authority like the role
discussed above. Rather, an emissary takes on
at least some of the perspective and goals of
him whom he represents, thereby gaining a
measure of authority himself. The emissary is
dedicated to his mission, whereas the servant
merely acquiesces, perhaps even grudgingly, to
accommodate the wishes of his master.
In societal context, the role of emissary
serves to mediate between he who appoints and
an extrinsic reality not otherwise readily
accessible to the appointer. Paralleling the
job of emissary within the complex functioning
of personality, the sub-personality of
emissary mediates between inner desires and
feelings and extrinsic reality. Sharing to a
degree the desires and perspective of the more
intense inner life, the sub-personality of
emissary accomplishes in outer reality what
spontaneous emotions can not directly. It is
employed when simple expression of the
feelings would not be effective, when the
means are different from the goal.
Often, inner feelings are too powerful to
permit direct expression. The integrated
personality employs a strategy not to utterly
abandon the most heartfelt desires yet be
effective. Very powerful feelings become
ideals. In order to change these feelings into
ideals the integrated personality refines and
abstracts the feelings and desires, focusing
on their essence to enable more effective and
directed expression. This process divides the
person’s being into a more spiritual and more
practical part.
Most emotions are relatively fleeting and
instable. The emissary sub-personality depends
on stable attitudes and feelings, however.
Otherwise, the emissary has no clear goal and
can not function as an emissary. Therefore,
the desires from which this role derives
vitality are the ultimate wishes of the
personality - the ideals, reflecting a level
of integration, clarity, and hierarchy which
immediate feelings, despite their wonderful,
heartfelt spontaneity, may lack. This division
of personality into inner self and outer
emissary effectuates the cooperation and
integration of two disparate parts.
This is not the place to enter more deeply
into this issue. It emerges from the writings
of the holy Ari, particularly regarding the
sephiros of Tohu, their shattering, and the
subsequent process of Tikun. The psychodynamic
notion of ego, with minor changes in emphasis
though major philosophical differences,
developed thousands of years after its
appearance in Torah literature.
Metatron
In the supernal realms, the parallel process
is the creation of the angel called Metatron,
the foreign minister. After Israel sinned with
the golden calf, God told Moses that he is
sending an angel to accompany the Children of
Israel, instead of being directly with them
Himself. Sinning is the spiritual equivalent
of the inefficacy of direct expression of
powerful inner desires. Rashi explains that
the angel God would send is Metatron, whose
name is like his Master’s in that the
numerical value of Metatron, 314, is the same
as the Name of God, Sha-dai . This indicates
that Metatron shares some of God’s “goals” for
us, but as the verse there states, we must be
cautious of this angel because he can not
overlook our sins, as an emissary who accepts
the goals of his Master but lacks the
flexibility and spontaneity which would allow
forgiveness. He measures our deeds according
to an external standard, like the emissary
sub-personality which measures our actions
according to standards of extrinsic reality.
The change in the Children of Israel’s Divine
service effectuated by transition to immediate
guidance by this angel was that we no longer
sensed direct, spontaneous inner contact with
God. Instead of spontaneous spiritual self
expression, Israel had to undertake to serve
God as emissaries. Serving Him as an emissary
is to receive direction by an angel rather
than by God directly. Serving God directly
would be passionate and unrestrained.
Rabbi Sholom Ber Schneersohn describes this
process regarding the difference between the
first and second giving of Torah, on Shavuot
and Yom Kippur, respectively. The original
plan was for us to receive only the five Books
of Moses and the book of Joshua. We would have
known all information contained in the other
holy books spontaneously, without need to
study later writings which expound the meaning
and detailed implications of Torah. When the
Torah was first given on Shavuot, then, it put
heightened awareness of God and His will into
our being, whose spontaneous expression would
be Torah life. The second giving of Torah,
though, on Yom Kippur, necessitated scrutiny
of all the other holy writings to learn God’s
will because knowledge of God’s will, though
still profoundly imbued into our being, no
longer was revealed in detail in spontaneous
consciousness. Rather, it became necessary to
undertake to actualize the Divine reality, our
spontaneous spiritual impulses, from an
external source, the other holy books. We had
to become God’s emissaries.
All of this is reflected, as above, in the
integrated personality functioning on two
levels, the inner level with profound desires,
values and feelings through which God is
represented within the personality but unable
to find adequate spontaneous expression in
extrinsic reality, and the personality role of
emissary, sharing something of the inner
reality and mediating between it and the
extrinsic world.
Other Considerations
Both sub-personalities discussed above derive
vitality from effort and success in the
extrinsic world, and inner reality is
suppressed or modified and reduced to
accommodate extrinsic considerations. Other
personality dimensions, while not necessarily
divorced from extrinsic considerations, are
more sensitive to, and oriented toward
expressing spontaneous inner realities. This,
too, could be a role: we may decide, for
example, to revel, to follow our whims and
feelings. On a more subtle level, we allow
ourselves to revel. Effective performance
within the boundaries of extrinsic reality,
then, is secondary to inner expression.
Reveling is a relatively extreme case of
orientation toward self expression.
Involvement in music or art, or athletics for
enjoyment may be other examples of focus on
self expression, though there are other
dimensions to these aspects of personality
too. There is emphasis on creativity.
In a healthier manner, there is joy in living.
Self esteem is not overly dependent on
external success and goals do not subvert
attention to the quality of the process of
living. Present and future are well
integrated.
The mystical equivalent of this is called
p’nimius, meaning inwardness. As opposed to
the previous levels which are considered
“outside the self”, i.e. not directly
affecting and expressing the self, but rather
assuming an external role to serve more
internal needs, the emotional dimensions of
personality being discussed here are
considered “within the self”. That is, these
mystical dimensions reflect and express the
self as it relates to God, rather than more
impersonal, remote, deliberate reactions like
accepting God’s Kingdom and Metatron. Thus,
there is intense, heartfelt love and yearning
to cling to or even merge with God, deeply
inspired awe, respectful devotion, and
profoundly overwhelming fear, all reflected in
rapturous song of praise as in Psalms or like
the angels of supernal worlds.
The Kabbalistic texts speak of the angels’
division into four camps, corresponding to the
four general camps of Israel surrounding the
Tabernacle, the dwelling place of the Divine
Presence in the desert. These angels are
Michael, Gabriel, Uriel and Raphael, and the
significance of their spiritual “place of
encampment” is the particular manner in which
each camp of angels perceives and reacts to
the Divine Presence: with love, fear, awe and
splendor, etc. (after all, there is no
physical position in spirituality). Michael
sings of God’s goodness, Gabriel of His power,
etc. The overall theme is the intense
immediacy of reaction to closeness to God.
Perhaps the closest people can come to
glimpsing these levels is in the rapturous
study of and delight in Torah, and
particularly of Kabbala, mentioned above:
This article can describe some general
patterns in dimensions of personality and
their mystical sources, but it does not intend
to be exhaustive. The richness and variety of
detail within our topic defy adequate
description. All aspects reflect the soul,
each offering a different perspective of the
entirety which can not be grasped adequately
in any of the specifics. Nevertheless, the
general perspective we offer enhances one’s
picture and experience of life and connects
individual experience to the mystical realms.
Awareness
Becoming aware of the different dimensions of
personality as separate entities greatly
benefits the person. Rather than fragmenting
personality, this awareness enhances
integration of the separate parts into a more
wholehearted whole. Each aspect of personality
has its own perspectives and energies, talents
and skills. When the specialness of each
personality dimension is undifferentiated from
the whole, all aspects of personality are
attenuated by the fuzziness and compromise of
the aggregate. For example, the transcendence
of intellect is impeded by the pragmatism of
practical functioning, and pragmatism is
diluted by the depth and uninvolvement of
intellect.
Separating these dimensions is called
“n’seera”, splitting, in Kabbalism. The term
derives from what the sages taught (Talmud,
Kesuvos) that originally, Adam and Eve were
created back to back as two visages of one
body, and only later were they split,
separating them from their original oneness so
that they could reunite face to face, each
individual with distinctive character and
individuated perspective and energies. Kabbala
interprets the mystical significance of this
story as splitting of the different potential
sub-personalities in order to achieve greater
fervor and deeper expression of each, leading
to a higher level of integration.
Freedom and Responsibilities
The specific roles, values, goals, and
personality styles an individual assumes
derive from choice. Indeed, Rambam considered
man’s nature free, so that we could choose,
and therefore are responsible for, our
emotions and attitudes as well as our deeds.
While other thinkers disagree to an extent,
describing the notion of “soul root” for
characteristic individual intellectual and
emotional predilections, they too attribute
free choice to man; one can either serve God
intentionally with one’s natural tendencies or
otherwise.
If choice is free, either according to
Rambam’s version or to that of the other
thinkers, it is not determined by
circumstances. One may wonder, then, what
basis exists for the soul to decide which
course to take and whether to serve God or
not. For the pragmatist, fear of God
determines the choice.
For higher soul levels, though, spontaneous
internal considerations greatly influence
choice. Moreover, mystical freedom of choice
does not mean only that one is able to
override one’s own emotional and or
attitudinal reactions. It is more than acting
altruistically against self interest or even
against what may make sense. Mystical freedom
means something more basic and profound: one
chooses a course in life, both in general and
in the specifics of day to day, which begins
from a perspective before considerations of
attitudinal and emotional reaction
of attitudinal and emotional reactions arise.
Mystical choice allows us to choose our
reality because it determines the manner in
which we will perceive everything that happens
to us, and hence, how we interpret and react
to the extrinsic realm. The external realm
does, indeed, affect us, but at least in terms
that we have chosen. We chart our lives
according to our choices, and live in the
reality we have chosen. Acknowledging the
existence of and expressing this level of soul
gives meaning to life. If we do not
acknowledge the existence of this ultimate
level of choice, this level of meaning is
denied us.
An Illustration
To illustrate: A certain great Chassidic Rebbe
was very ill for many years, and suffered
greatly. Following the directions of the
Talmud, he first examined his deeds to see if
his sins could account for his suffering.
Finding that he was blameless in this area, he
next sought instances when he may have wasted
time he could have otherwise spent studying
Torah. Here, too, he found no personal
deficit. Gradually, he came to the conclusion
that his suffering was for the sake of all of
Israel. This view did not end his suffering,
but his suffering was now greatly transformed
and deeply meaningful.
If this level of soul is independent of
extrinsic considerations, including what makes
sense and personal attitudinal and emotional
inclinations, what basis does exist for the
soul to choose? It seems there is none.
Indeed, it has become commonplace in modern
thinking, for example among existentialists,
that being free is exceedingly difficult, and
man will strive mightily to avoid having to
confront freedom honestly.
At this level of reality, the soul discovers
God. This may occur in two ways. Dismayed at
finding no basis for choice, the soul turns to
an external source of authority to counteract
anxiety. It follows a realistic recognition
that the soul is not God, that there is a
Power greater than us, and a right and wrong.
The soul transcends solipsism and recognizes
an objective ethical and religious reality,
independent of personal predilections.
Alternatively, the soul realizes that through
free choice, by sharing in directing the
course of the universe at least regarding its
own life, it partakes of Godliness. As such,
it can choose as it pleases. This level is
called the crown, Keser.
Having just emerged from submersion in
extrinsic reality, with pragmatic
considerations given great weight, the soul
must exercise great caution here. The first
tendency may be to celebrate freedom by
breaking spiritual and emotional boundaries.
Such thinkers as the Sabbatians, Nietzche and
Nazism, may their names be eradicated, went in
this course, and their thinking lead to
destruction. When evil originates in a high
spiritual place, it is far worse than when it
is merely an error in judgment or inability to
overcome desires of the evil inclination.
More careful consideration brings the mature
realization that one is truly free and need
not rebel against spiritual and emotional
boundaries. These cease to appear onerous. At
this point, one begins to truly “share” a
Godly perspective, and the process of
formulating an approach to life begins from
the true soul’s point of view. One “shares” in
creation of the world, as the sages say on the
verse: “Come to Kheshbon”: “Let us figure out the
world”. Restraint becomes an expression of
love, of cherishing life and taking care to
make it emerge beautiful, graceful, wise,
stable, spiritual and Godly.
Levels of the Soul
Soul has levels independent of extrinsic
reality, and for spiritual and mental health,
one must deal with and give expression to
these levels of soul. Just as failure to
acknowledge and express other dimensions of
personality, such as emotional needs, leads to
intense discomfort, frustration, and inability
to function, so, too, failure to recognize
one’s spiritual needs and respect the aspects
of one’s inner reality that are independent of
extrinsic considerations thwarts the inner
being and leads to deep dissatisfaction.
Still, from where does the soul find choice
and will, if there are no extrinsic
considerations? From the pure, Godly pleasure
inherent within the soul. This is called the
inner dimension of the crown. It is absolutely
delightful to live as a righteous person, as a
tzaddik, to be selflessly loving, generous,
helpful and supporting, to pore over the
treasures of Torah wisdom, to treat all
people, and all of the creation, respectfully,
to cherish and value life and aspire to
elevate it to the highest possible level, to
connect it to God in every way, and to reveal
God through each aspect of the universe. These
are the Mitzvahs, which employ extrinsic
reality to reveal the sublime reality within.
Let us notice that the inner dimension of
Keser does not act in the world. Above the
entirety of different sub-personalities,
playing no role and serving no function, is
this essence of the soul, present only as the
way the Shechina, the Divine Presence, resides
in the person. It is like Moshe Rabbeinu who
played no active role in building the mishkan,
the Tabernacle, yet whose being and presence
gave meaning to the mishkan. Essentially, the
Tabernacle, the Tent of Meeting, was built for
Moshe as a place to meet with the Divine. In
the same manner, the essence of the soul is
that element of soul which gives meaning to
the whole of life, which integrates the whole
personality, which appreciates the whole. It
is the nexus of the Divine and the individual
wherein the individual’s avoda, Divine
service, finds favor in the eyes of God.
~~~~~~~
from the October/November 1999 of the Jewish Magazine
|
Please let us know if you see something unsavory on the Google Ads and we will have them removed. Email us with the offensive URL (www.something.com)
|
|